Sunday, October 1, 2017

Sermon - 17th Sunday after Pentecost

Matthew 21:23-32 



            A man had two sons.  Just because two individuals come from the same gene pool, doesn't mean they are going to be alike.  Even if they are raised in the same family, treated in the same manner, regarded with the same affection, there is no guarantee they are going to behave in the same manner.  Having two sons means that one has two individuals and each is going to do as they please.  It would be simpler if they were the same.  Then you would know what to do and how to handle them.  But each is going to be themselves, acting as they so choose.

            Jesus tells a parable about two sons because he wants to acknowledge the differences with which the children of God respond to God's word.  He wants to acknowledge that among God's children there are those who say "No!" and then live a "yes," while there are those who shout an emphatic "Yes!" only to live a "no."  Just because it is the same God who speaks to us; just because God speaks the same words and interacts in the same manner; it does mean that we will respond in the same way.

            The people to whom Jesus spoke these words had not.  In the crowd that day there were at least two differing groups of individuals.  One group was made up of the chief priests and elders.  Up to the giving of the parable, they are the ones who had felt pretty good about how they had responded.  They were teachers of the Word of God; they were the caretakers of God's story; the spokes­persons for God's commands.  They had definitely said "Yes" to God and they were living in the confidence of having confessed God as Lord.

            But, as Jesus points out, their confession had not been followed up with action.  They had thrown their hat into the ring early; they had joined up with God's people and in fact had taken on the responsibility of inviting others into the family of God.  They had taken the name of the Lord, they had committed them­selves to that word, but as the day had progressed they were not in the vineyard working, they were resting in the shade, think­ing their confession was enough.

            They had not listened to John the Baptist.  In fact, this whole encounter comes about because they came to Jesus, demanding to know upon what authority he taught.  Rather than give them a straight answer, Jesus had promised to answer if they would tell him whether John's message was from God.  The malice of their ways is exposed in their reluctance to respond to Jesus' question.  Matthew records they argued with one another, "If we say, 'From heaven,' he will say to us, 'Why then did you not believe him?'  But if we say, 'Of human origin,' we are afraid of the crowd;  for all regard John as a prophet."  So they answered Jesus, "We do not know."

            Those who find themselves in this dilemma were the ones who had said "Yes" to God.  These were the son who was courteous and prompt in telling the father they would go and work in the vineyard.  But they do not follow through.  They must have believed they had given God everything that was called for.

            We see the error of their ways by looking at the other group.  This other group is comprised of folks we had just as soon overlook or ignore.  Jesus describes them as tax collectors and prosti­tutes.  We might call them lawyers and drug dealers.  These were the hated classes.  Tax collectors and prostitutes were about as low on the social ladder as one could go. 

            Remember that the tax collectors were collecting taxes for Rome.  They were collecting money in order to pay the salaries of the soldiers that had been sent by Rome to oversee Palestine.  These taxes were not col­lected and then spent on a public health plan. Tax collectors made it possible for the occupying forces to occupy. 

            Prosti­tutes were more than a threat to an individual's moral character.  Most often prostitution was associated with the worship of the pagan gods.  Interaction with them implied a denial or rejection of Yahweh.

            These people are the first son in Jesus' parable.  Somewhere along the way they had said a "no" to God.  For whatever reason, they had decided to go their own way and do their own thing.  They had rejected the Word which was so precious to those chief priest and elders.  They wanted no part of it.

            But then something happened.  Someone came into their path and they found themselves listening with a renewed hope.  Whereas they had come to think that their "No" was the end of it, a new opportunity was being extended to them.  John the Baptist had spoken of this opportunity.  As they listened to him they had come to believe there might be a second chance, that it might be possible for them to revisit their earlier response and reconsid­er their choices.  John had said it was possible.  He had offered them a sign of this possibility.  In the waters of the Jordan River they had acknowledged their earlier transgression and emerged with a renewed hope.  Thankful for all that God had done, they were now in the company of God's messenger.  They were doing the work the father asked them to do.

            Two children, raised in the same family, regarded equally by the same father, and yet their responses are entirely different.  One believes that making a confession with their lips is enough.  The other understands that the hope of the Father is to be His hands, doing His work in the world.  This child responds, out of appreciation, for all that the father has done.  Regardless of their previous responses, they are now setting themselves about the task of working in the vineyard.

            Which child are you?  Do you think of yourselves as one of the chief priests and elders or are you among the tax collectors and prostitutes?  If you don't like having to choose between those options, I'll break it down for you in another way; is your following of Jesus little more than a confession of the lips?  Or does is a spoken “Yes” supported by action and commitment to the things Jesus would do, where he in your shoes?

            The tax collectors and prostitutes knew that their only access to God was through Jesus' radical word of forgiveness.  On their own they had no right to claim to be acceptable in God's eyes.  It is out of gratitude for that acceptance that they reconsider their "No" and decide to go into the vineyard.  Their giving of themselves is an indica­tion of the appreciation they have for that which God has given them. 

            May we all be like these tax collectors and prostitutes.


Amen.

No comments:

Post a Comment